HCMT vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. HCMT is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

HCMT vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 8.31% return.

HCMT

• 1D: -4.45%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 32.49%
• 3Y*: 18.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMT vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	4.79%	3.62%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	8.31%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMT and GXLC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

HCMT vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMT

HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 37
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMT vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCMT	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	—	—

Drawdowns

HCMT vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCMT	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-9.08%	-27.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.58%	-3.05%	-3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.18%	-1.54%	-6.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HCMT	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	13.85%	+12.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.01%	13.85%	+15.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.01%	13.85%	+15.16%

HCMT vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCMT vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than GXLC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF	0.40%	0.43%	2.75%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCMT and GXLC in my portfolio?

HCMT and GXLC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HCMT or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCMT or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCMT or GXLC?

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.40% for HCMT.

What is the main difference between HCMT and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.02% for GXLC.