HCMKX vs. HCMDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HCMKX (HCM Income Plus Fund) and HCMDX (HCM Tactical Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - HCMKX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Howard Capital Management, while HCMDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Howard Capital Management. Over the past 5 years, HCMKX returned 9.70%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for HCMDX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HCMKX charges 2.10%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for HCMDX.

Performance

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Income Plus Fund (HCMKX) and HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HCMKX having a 11.19% return and HCMDX slightly lower at 10.91%.

HCMKX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 28.89%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: —

HCMDX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 10.91%
• 6M: 8.57%
• 1Y: 36.37%
• 3Y*: 27.76%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 19.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HCMKX HCM Income Plus Fund	11.19%	15.06%	32.19%	20.68%	-24.98%	8.97%	39.45%	14.64%	-4.75%	5.72%
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund	10.91%	16.55%	49.90%	32.05%	-39.00%	38.72%	52.10%	21.79%	-7.68%	32.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMKX and HCMDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.96

The correlation between HCMKX and HCMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HCMKX vs. HCMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMKX

HCMKX Risk / Return Rank: 43
HCMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
HCMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
HCMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
HCMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
HCMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

HCMDX

HCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 32
HCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
HCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
HCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
HCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
HCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Income Plus Fund (HCMKX) and HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCMKX	HCMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.58	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.05	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.29	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.91	6.12	+1.79

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the HCMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMKX and HCMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMKX drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum HCMDX drawdown of -40.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMKX and HCMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCMKX	HCMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.43%	-40.89%	+12.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-17.00%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.05%	-25.96%	+8.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.43%	-40.89%	+12.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-2.35%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-11.38%	+4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	6.35%	-2.49%

Volatility

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Income Plus Fund (HCMKX) is 8.66%, while HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that HCMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCMKX	HCMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.66%	11.33%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.60%	18.46%	-4.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.34%	24.61%	-7.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.82%	24.49%	-8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.23%	24.32%	-10.09%

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMKX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMDX's 2.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Dividend Comparison

HCMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than HCMDX's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund	2.69%	2.98%	23.23%	0.00%	0.72%	0.99%	3.24%	0.00%	5.05%	0.00%	0.00%	1.47%
HCMKX HCM Income Plus Fund	3.29%	3.66%	19.48%	0.04%	0.00%	0.20%	0.27%	0.16%	5.97%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCMKX and HCMDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, HCMKX and HCMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HCMKX or HCMDX?

HCMDX has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to HCMKX (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMKX dropped -28.43% vs HCMDX's -40.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HCMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.