PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCMKX vs. HCMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Income Plus Fund (HCMKX) and HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMKX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than HCMDX's 13.58% return.


HCMKX

1D
0.55%
1M
8.66%
YTD
11.75%
6M
10.71%
1Y
31.59%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*

HCMDX

1D
0.77%
1M
13.21%
YTD
13.58%
6M
11.29%
1Y
41.18%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
19.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCMKX
HCM Income Plus Fund
11.75%15.06%32.19%20.68%-24.98%8.97%39.45%14.64%-4.75%5.72%
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
13.58%16.55%49.90%32.05%-39.00%38.72%52.10%21.79%-7.68%30.59%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMKX and HCMDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.96

The correlation between HCMKX and HCMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCMKX vs. HCMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMKX
HCMKX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HCMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HCMDX
HCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Income Plus Fund (HCMKX) and HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCMKXHCMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.91

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

2.41

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.53

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.59

6.87

+1.72

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the HCMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMKX and HCMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCMKXHCMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.91

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.63

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.67

+0.13

Drawdowns

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMKX drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum HCMDX drawdown of -40.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMKX and HCMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCMKXHCMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-40.89%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-17.00%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

-25.96%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-40.89%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-11.42%

+4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

6.24%

-2.48%

Volatility

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Income Plus Fund (HCMKX) is 4.91%, while HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that HCMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCMKXHCMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

5.83%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

15.67%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

22.51%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

24.08%

-8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

24.11%

-10.08%

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMKX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMDX's 2.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCMKX vs. HCMDX - Dividend Comparison

HCMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than HCMDX's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCMDX
HCM Tactical Growth Fund
2.62%2.98%23.23%0.00%0.72%0.99%3.24%0.00%5.05%0.00%0.00%1.47%
HCMKX
HCM Income Plus Fund
3.27%3.66%19.48%0.04%0.00%0.20%0.27%0.16%5.97%0.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, HCMKX and HCMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HCMDX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to HCMKX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMKX dropped -28.43% vs HCMDX's -40.89%.

HCMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCMKX and HCMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer