HBRD vs. SPHQ
HBRD (Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBRD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while SPHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HBRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HBRD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $169.16 | $296.60 | $2.86K | |
| $136.19M | $141.12M | $141.46M |
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | -0.24% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBRD and SPHQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBRD vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
HBRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPHQ
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBRD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBRD drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBRD and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBRD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -57.83% | +54.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -5.62% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -10.64% | +10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBRD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25% | 14.31% | -11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 16.71% | -13.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 17.96% | -14.71% |
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBRD vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
HBRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SPHQ's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBRD and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBRD.
HBRD has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.10% for SPHQ.
HBRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SPHQ is Quality Factor. HBRD tracks ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBRD and 0.15% for SPHQ.
Find the right allocation for HBRD and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer