HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC).
HBIX.NEO and BCCC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBIX.NEO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025. BCCC is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025.
Performance
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | -24.07% | -17.53% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -17.09% | -6.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
HBIX.NEO is traded in CAD, while BCCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -24.07% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -17.26% return.
HBIX.NEO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- -24.07%
- 6M
- -46.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- -17.26%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBIX.NEO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.76 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBIX.NEO and BCCC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.84%, less than BCCC's 51.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | 37.84% | 20.21% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 51.24% | 29.55% |
Drawdowns
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.90%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -42.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and BCCC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBIX.NEO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.90% | -41.62% | -14.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.72% | -34.57% | -15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -14.34% | -5.57% |
Volatility
HBIX.NEO vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBIX.NEO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.86% | 35.85% | +17.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.86% | 35.85% | +17.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.86% | 35.85% | +17.01% |