PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
-24.07%-6.82%
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-21.37%-7.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -24.07% return, which is significantly lower than BTCX-B.TO's -21.37% return.


HBIX.NEO

1D
0.15%
1M
1.72%
YTD
-24.07%
6M
-46.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCX-B.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-21.37%
6M
-42.48%
1Y
-22.73%
3Y*
33.89%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCX-B.TO's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIX.NEO

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBIX.NEOBTCX-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

0.10

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between HBIX.NEO and BTCX-B.TO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.84%, while BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.90%, smaller than the maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown of -75.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and BTCX-B.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HBIX.NEOBTCX-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.90%

-75.26%

+19.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.72%

-46.16%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-32.69%

+12.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.80%

Volatility

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HBIX.NEOBTCX-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.86%

44.76%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.86%

55.65%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.86%

55.56%

-2.70%