HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO).

HBIX.NEO and FBTC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBIX.NEO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025. FBTC.TO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2021.

Performance

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-24.07%	-6.82%
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	-21.31%	-7.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -24.07% return, which is significantly lower than FBTC.TO's -21.31% return.

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: -24.07%
• 6M: -46.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBTC.TO

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: -21.31%
• 6M: -42.50%
• 1Y: -22.45%
• 3Y*: 33.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

HBIX.NEO

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF

FBTC.TO

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO

FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBIX.NEO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	0.10	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between HBIX.NEO and FBTC.TO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.84%, while FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	37.84%	20.21%
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HBIX.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.90%, smaller than the maximum FBTC.TO drawdown of -70.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and FBTC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBIX.NEO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.90%	-70.77%	+14.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.72%	-46.28%	-3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.91%	-30.54%	+10.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HBIX.NEO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.86%	44.79%	+8.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.86%	52.97%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.86%	52.97%	-0.11%