HARD vs. CCOM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HARD (Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds from Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HARD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CCOM.

Performance

HARD vs. CCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HARD

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -1.46%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 1Y: 11.60%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOM

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -1.53%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HARD vs. CCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	0.77%
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	-5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HARD and CCOM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.25

Return for Risk

HARD vs. CCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HARD

HARD Risk / Return Rank: 17
HARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HARD Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HARD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

CCOM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HARD vs. CCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HARD	CCOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	—	—

Drawdowns

HARD vs. CCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HARD drawdown since its inception was -20.81%, which is greater than CCOM's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HARD and CCOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HARD	CCOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.81%	-7.44%	-13.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.44%	-7.44%	-9.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.86%	-2.96%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HARD	CCOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.32%	13.01%	+13.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	13.01%	+6.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	13.01%	+6.04%

HARD vs. CCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HARD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

HARD vs. CCOM - Dividend Comparison

HARD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than CCOM's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	2.99%	2.36%	3.51%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HARD and CCOM in my portfolio?

HARD and CCOM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HARD or CCOM?

On fees, HARD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HARD or CCOM?

HARD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HARD or CCOM?

HARD has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 1.29% for CCOM.

What is the main difference between HARD and CCOM?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HARD and 0.99% for CCOM.