CCOM vs. CTA
CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOM is a Commodities fund actively managed by Simplify, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOM charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.
Performance
CCOM vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCOM
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOM vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -1.23% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM and CTA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM
CTA
CCOM vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOM | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.62 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
CCOM vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM drawdown since its inception was -5.40%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -18.07% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -7.86% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -5.67% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility
CCOM vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 20.12% | -6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 16.58% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 16.58% | -3.01% |
CCOM vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOM has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOM vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than CTA's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 4.85% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM and CTA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTA is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTA is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
CTA has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.82% for CCOM.
CCOM is categorized as Commodities, while CTA is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CCOM and 0.78% for CTA.
Find the right allocation for CCOM and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer