CCOM vs. AGGH
CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOM is a Commodities fund actively managed by Simplify, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCOM charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
CCOM vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCOM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.96M | $2.87M | $3.88M | |
| $489.06 | $1.63K | $4.84K |
CCOM vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -3.71% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM and AGGH is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AGGH
CCOM vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOM | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOM vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM drawdown since its inception was -7.44%, smaller than the maximum AGGH drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -13.26% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -2.17% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -4.34% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility
CCOM vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 5.28% | +7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 8.35% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 8.35% | +4.13% |
CCOM vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOM has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOM vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than AGGH's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.56% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM and AGGH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.26% for CCOM.
CCOM is categorized as Commodities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CCOM and 0.33% for AGGH.
Find the right allocation for CCOM and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer