PortfoliosLab logo
HARD vs. CTA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HARD and CTA is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HARD vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HARD:

1.00

CTA:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

HARD:

1.52

CTA:

0.71

Omega Ratio

HARD:

1.20

CTA:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

HARD:

1.46

CTA:

0.60

Martin Ratio

HARD:

3.19

CTA:

1.14

Ulcer Index

HARD:

6.17%

CTA:

4.84%

Daily Std Dev

HARD:

18.25%

CTA:

12.64%

Max Drawdown

HARD:

-13.51%

CTA:

-18.07%

Current Drawdown

HARD:

-8.99%

CTA:

-8.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HARD achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than CTA's -0.56% return.


HARD

YTD

7.03%

1M

2.85%

6M

20.63%

1Y

18.21%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CTA

YTD

-0.56%

1M

-0.58%

6M

6.53%

1Y

4.58%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HARD vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HARD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HARD vs. CTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HARD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HARD is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HARD is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HARD is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HARD is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HARD is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HARD is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTA is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTA is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTA is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTA is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTA is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTA is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HARD vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HARD Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HARD and CTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HARD vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

HARD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than CTA's 4.74% yield.


TTM202420232022
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.18%3.51%1.95%0.00%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.74%4.80%7.78%6.58%

Drawdowns

HARD vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HARD drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HARD and CTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HARD vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) at 3.45%. This indicates that HARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...