PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOM vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCOM vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCOM

1D
-1.01%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PIT

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
41.36%
6M
42.58%
1Y
62.93%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOM vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CCOM and PIT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOM vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOM

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOM vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCOM vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCOMPITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

1.07

-1.33

Drawdowns

CCOM vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOM drawdown since its inception was -5.40%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOMPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-12.27%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-4.56%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-3.99%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

Volatility

CCOM vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOMPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

21.30%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

17.47%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.57%

17.47%

-3.90%

CCOM vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOM has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCOM vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than PIT's 6.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CCOM
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.31%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCOM and PIT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 0.82% for CCOM.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CCOM and 0.55% for PIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOM and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer