HAPI vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
HAPI and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAPI is a passively managed fund by Harbor Funds that tracks the performance of the CIBC Human Capital Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2022. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both HAPI and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAPI or FNGS.
Correlation
The correlation between HAPI and FNGS is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HAPI vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HAPI:
2.02
FNGS:
1.80
HAPI:
2.69
FNGS:
2.32
HAPI:
1.37
FNGS:
1.31
HAPI:
2.84
FNGS:
2.60
HAPI:
11.82
FNGS:
8.21
HAPI:
2.26%
FNGS:
5.63%
HAPI:
13.24%
FNGS:
25.74%
HAPI:
-9.41%
FNGS:
-48.98%
HAPI:
0.00%
FNGS:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAPI achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 6.92% return.
HAPI
4.83%
2.40%
11.92%
25.25%
N/A
N/A
FNGS
6.92%
5.80%
26.17%
44.54%
29.63%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAPI vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAPI vs. FNGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HAPI
FNGS
HAPI vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAPI vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
HAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF | 0.20% | 0.21% | 1.02% | 0.29% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HAPI vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAPI drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPI and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAPI vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) is 3.09%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that HAPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.