HAPI vs. HAPS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HAPI (Harbor Corporate Culture ETF) and HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CIBC Human Capital Index, while HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPI returned 20.53%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for HAPS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAPI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HAPS.

Performance

HAPI vs. HAPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPI achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than HAPS's 14.76% return.

HAPI

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 19.78%
• 3Y*: 20.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAPS

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 14.76%
• 6M: 12.78%
• 1Y: 30.70%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPI vs. HAPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	6.59%	16.26%	27.62%	19.72%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	14.76%	8.35%	4.08%	13.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPI and HAPS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2023	0.71

The correlation between HAPI and HAPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAPI vs. HAPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAPI	HAPS
Technology	32.0%	16.8%
Communication Services	14.9%	2.7%
Financial Services	12.5%	17.3%
Industrials	9.1%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	8.4%
Healthcare	7.9%	16.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	2.7%
Energy	3.0%	7.2%
Utilities	2.7%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.5%	5.9%
Basic Materials	1.5%	5.7%

Return for Risk

HAPI vs. HAPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPI

HAPI Risk / Return Rank: 54
HAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 61
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPI vs. HAPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAPI	HAPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.81	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.66	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	3.08	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	10.43	-0.04

HAPI vs. HAPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the HAPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPI and HAPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAPI vs. HAPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum HAPS drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPI and HAPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPI	HAPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-27.44%	+7.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-10.01%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-27.44%	+7.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	0.00%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-6.04%	+4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	2.95%	-1.04%

Volatility

HAPI vs. HAPS - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAPI	HAPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.01%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	11.92%	-2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	17.10%	-5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	20.75%	-5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	20.75%	-5.00%

HAPI vs. HAPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HAPS's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPI vs. HAPS - Dividend Comparison

HAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than HAPS's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	0.81%	0.87%	0.21%	1.21%	0.29%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.49%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPI and HAPS in my portfolio?

HAPI and HAPS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAPI or HAPS?

HAPI has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to HAPS (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPI dropped -19.46% vs HAPS's -27.44%.

Which ETF is better, HAPI or HAPS?

On 3-year performance, HAPI leads with 20.53% vs 13.58% for HAPS. On fees, HAPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAPI or HAPS?

Over the 3-year period, HAPI has performed better with a 20.53% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPI or HAPS?

HAPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPI or HAPS?

HAPI has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.49% for HAPS.

What is the main difference between HAPI and HAPS?

HAPI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HAPS is Small Cap Blend Equities. HAPI tracks CIBC Human Capital Index, while HAPS tracks Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAPI and 0.60% for HAPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.