PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAP vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HAP vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HAP vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
20.50%34.91%-4.08%2.46%7.84%25.04%6.30%18.60%-10.68%17.12%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
7.24%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 20.50% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 12.75%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.


HAP

1D
2.33%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
20.50%
6M
29.86%
1Y
48.82%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
12.75%

NLR

1D
4.76%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
7.24%
6M
0.63%
1Y
86.31%
3Y*
37.32%
5Y*
23.33%
10Y*
13.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HAP vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HAP vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAP vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAPNLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.06

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.63

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.26

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.89

7.88

+11.00

HAP vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAP and NLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAPNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.06

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.83

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.59

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.18

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between HAP and NLR is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HAP vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than NLR's 2.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
1.88%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%
NLR
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
2.38%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Drawdowns

HAP vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and NLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HAPNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-65.05%

+14.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-25.80%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-30.48%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.07%

-34.35%

-9.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-18.97%

+16.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-35.91%

+23.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

10.67%

-8.07%

Volatility

HAP vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 6.40%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 14.04%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HAPNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

14.04%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

32.94%

-20.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

42.23%

-23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

28.16%

-9.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.81%

23.39%

-3.58%