HAP vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
HAP and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Van Eck Hard Assets Producers Index. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both HAP and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAP or URA.
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and URA is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HAP vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HAP:
-0.14
URA:
-0.47
HAP:
-0.07
URA:
-0.45
HAP:
0.99
URA:
0.95
HAP:
-0.15
URA:
-0.24
HAP:
-0.40
URA:
-1.12
HAP:
6.36%
URA:
16.69%
HAP:
18.24%
URA:
39.30%
HAP:
-50.73%
URA:
-93.54%
HAP:
-8.27%
URA:
-75.23%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than URA's -14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 6.01%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.70% annualized return.
HAP
4.67%
-5.24%
-6.17%
-3.19%
15.24%
6.01%
URA
-14.60%
-9.21%
-29.80%
-18.60%
21.92%
3.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAP vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAP vs. URA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HAP
URA
HAP vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAP vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than URA's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF | 2.53% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% | 2.51% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.35% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
Drawdowns
HAP vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAP vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 12.51%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.