HAP vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
HAP and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both HAP and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HAP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HAP vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 20.42% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.60% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 1.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HAP having a 12.74% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 12.81%.
HAP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 29.48%
- 1Y
- 48.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 16.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
DGRO
HAP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 1.14 | +1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 1.66 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.25 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 1.48 | +2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.71 | 6.80 | +11.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 1.14 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.74 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.77 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.73 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and DGRO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HAP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DGRO's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.88% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
HAP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and DGRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -35.10% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.50% | -10.92% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -19.31% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | -35.10% | -8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -4.70% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -3.48% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.37% | +0.23% |
Volatility
HAP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.57%. This indicates that HAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 3.57% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 7.21% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 14.47% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 13.84% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 16.63% | +3.18% |