HAP vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
HAP and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Van Eck Hard Assets Producers Index. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both HAP and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAP or DGRO.
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and DGRO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HAP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HAP:
-0.37
DGRO:
1.59
HAP:
-0.40
DGRO:
2.24
HAP:
0.95
DGRO:
1.29
HAP:
-0.37
DGRO:
2.64
HAP:
-1.11
DGRO:
9.76
HAP:
4.69%
DGRO:
1.60%
HAP:
13.87%
DGRO:
9.82%
HAP:
-50.73%
DGRO:
-35.10%
HAP:
-13.84%
DGRO:
-5.92%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 15.46% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 5.57%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.19% annualized return.
HAP
-5.70%
-7.98%
-8.07%
-3.87%
7.01%
5.57%
DGRO
15.46%
-3.02%
6.16%
17.40%
10.29%
11.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
HAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF | 0.00% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% | 2.51% | 2.22% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.28% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HAP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.31%. This indicates that HAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.