PortfoliosLab logo
HAP vs. DGRO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HAP and DGRO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HAP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HAP:

-0.20

DGRO:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

HAP:

-0.06

DGRO:

0.90

Omega Ratio

HAP:

0.99

DGRO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

HAP:

-0.14

DGRO:

0.61

Martin Ratio

HAP:

-0.36

DGRO:

2.45

Ulcer Index

HAP:

6.56%

DGRO:

3.51%

Daily Std Dev

HAP:

18.29%

DGRO:

14.86%

Max Drawdown

HAP:

-50.73%

DGRO:

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

HAP:

-5.12%

DGRO:

-5.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's -0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 6.02%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.22% annualized return.


HAP

YTD

8.27%

1M

9.32%

6M

-0.01%

1Y

-3.56%

5Y*

15.10%

10Y*

6.02%

DGRO

YTD

-0.84%

1M

5.53%

6M

-4.61%

1Y

7.15%

5Y*

13.58%

10Y*

11.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HAP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HAP vs. DGRO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HAP is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HAP is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HAP is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HAP is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HAP is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HAP is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DGRO is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DGRO is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HAP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HAP Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAP and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HAP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than DGRO's 2.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HAP
VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF
2.45%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.69%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%2.51%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.29%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%0.97%

Drawdowns

HAP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HAP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 5.51% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...