HAP vs. FTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO).
HAP and FTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. FTWO is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. It was launched on Aug 30, 2023. Both HAP and FTWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HAP vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HAP vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 20.50% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 1.22% |
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 11.99% | 43.06% | 14.97% | 1.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 20.50% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 11.99% return.
HAP
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 20.50%
- 6M
- 29.86%
- 1Y
- 48.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
FTWO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 49.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAP vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
FTWO
HAP vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAP | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.22 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 2.83 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.42 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.68 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.89 | 15.61 | +3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAP | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.22 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.44 | -1.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and FTWO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HAP vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than FTWO's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.88% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HAP vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and FTWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -18.17% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -13.63% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -8.30% | +5.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -3.13% | -9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.21% | -0.61% |
Volatility
HAP vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 6.68% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 14.80% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 22.54% | -3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 19.25% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 19.25% | +0.56% |