FTWO vs. STXK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) and STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while STXK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTWO returned 21.43% vs 27.10% for STXK. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for STXK.

Performance

FTWO vs. STXK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than STXK's 15.13% return.

FTWO

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: -1.24%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 1Y: 21.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.01%

STXK

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.80%
• 6M: 10.00%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 1Y: 27.10%
• 3Y*: 12.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	$191.82K	$225.86K	$302.09K
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	$402.92K	$277.57K	$260.64K

FTWO vs. STXK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	7.80%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	15.13%	7.82%	9.47%	9.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWO and STXK is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.59

The correlation between FTWO and STXK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTWO vs. STXK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTWO	STXK
Industrials	37.5%	15.0%
Basic Materials	26.5%	4.2%
Energy	24.3%	5.6%
Utilities	10.6%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	2.7%
Communication Services	-	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.4%
Financial Services	-	15.8%
Healthcare	-	13.8%
Real Estate	-	7.2%
Technology	-	17.3%

Return for Risk

FTWO vs. STXK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 38
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

STXK

STXK Risk / Return Rank: 68
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 61
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTWO vs. STXK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTWO	STXK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.51	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.27	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.26	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	2.57	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	9.05	-5.99

FTWO vs. STXK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the STXK Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWO and STXK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTWO vs. STXK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum STXK drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and STXK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWO	STXK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-27.12%	+8.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-9.81%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.73%	-1.84%	-9.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-5.41%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	2.78%	+3.67%

Volatility

FTWO vs. STXK - Volatility Comparison

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) at 3.53%. This indicates that FTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STXK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWO	STXK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	3.53%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.95%	11.59%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.04%	16.72%	+2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	19.91%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	19.91%	-0.73%

FTWO vs. STXK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXK's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWO vs. STXK - Dividend Comparison

FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than STXK's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	0.93%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	1.15%	1.29%	1.64%	1.14%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWO and STXK in my portfolio?

FTWO and STXK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTWO or STXK?

FTWO has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to STXK (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTWO dropped -18.17% vs STXK's -27.12%.

Which ETF is better, FTWO or STXK?

On 1-year performance, STXK leads with 27.10% vs 21.43% for FTWO. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTWO or STXK?

Over the 1-year period, STXK has performed better with a 27.10% return vs 21.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWO or STXK?

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTWO or STXK?

STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.93% for FTWO.

What is the main difference between FTWO and STXK?

FTWO is categorized as Energy Equities, while STXK is Small Cap Blend Equities. FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTWO and 0.18% for STXK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.