FTWO vs. STXK
FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) and STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while STXK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTWO returned 24.37% vs 28.22% for STXK. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for STXK.
Performance
FTWO vs. STXK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than STXK's 13.83% return.
FTWO
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STXK
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTWO vs. STXK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 7.77% | 43.06% | 14.97% | 0.75% |
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 13.83% | 7.82% | 9.47% | 9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWO and STXK is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FTWO and STXK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTWO vs. STXK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTWO
STXK
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
FTWO
STXK
Energy
FTWO
STXK
Basic Materials
FTWO
STXK
Utilities
FTWO
STXK
Consumer Defensive
FTWO
STXK
Communication Services
FTWO
-
STXK
Consumer Cyclical
FTWO
-
STXK
Financial Services
FTWO
-
STXK
Healthcare
FTWO
-
STXK
Real Estate
FTWO
-
STXK
Technology
FTWO
-
STXK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTWO vs. STXK — Risk / Return Rank
FTWO
STXK
FTWO vs. STXK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTWO | STXK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.89 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 10.00 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTWO vs. STXK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum STXK drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and STXK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWO | STXK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -27.12% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -9.81% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.75% | -0.28% | -11.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -5.53% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 2.83% | +2.17% |
Volatility
FTWO vs. STXK - Volatility Comparison
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) at 4.54%. This indicates that FTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STXK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTWO | STXK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 4.54% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 11.87% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 16.98% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 20.10% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 20.10% | -0.79% |
FTWO vs. STXK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXK's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTWO vs. STXK - Dividend Comparison
FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than STXK's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 1.29% | 1.64% | 1.14% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTWO and STXK have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTWO has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to STXK (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTWO dropped -18.17% vs STXK's -27.12%.
On 1-year performance, STXK leads with 28.22% vs 24.37% for FTWO. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STXK has performed better with a 28.22% return vs 24.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.
STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.04% for FTWO.
FTWO is categorized as Energy Equities, while STXK is Small Cap Blend Equities. FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTWO and 0.18% for STXK.
STXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTWO and STXK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer