FTWO vs. QTUM
Compare and contrast key facts about Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM).
FTWO and QTUM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTWO is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. It was launched on Aug 30, 2023. QTUM is a passively managed fund by Defiance that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2018. Both FTWO and QTUM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTWO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTWO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 11.99% | 43.06% | 14.97% | 1.46% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | -1.95% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 7.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's -1.95% return.
FTWO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 49.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 5.03%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 45.59%
- 3Y*
- 33.36%
- 5Y*
- 18.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTWO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTWO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
FTWO
QTUM
FTWO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 1.54 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.17 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.29 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 2.91 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 10.27 | +5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.54 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.83 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTWO and QTUM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FTWO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than QTUM's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 1.09% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Drawdowns
FTWO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and QTUM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -38.45% | +20.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -15.26% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.30% | -11.00% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -8.40% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 4.32% | -1.11% |
Volatility
FTWO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is 6.68%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that FTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTWO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 10.18% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 20.80% | -6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 29.67% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 26.23% | -6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 27.05% | -7.80% |