FTWO vs. TINY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTWO returned 26.68% vs 128.45% for TINY. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.

Performance

FTWO vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 77.76% return.

FTWO

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 26.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TINY

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 17.94%
• YTD: 77.76%
• 6M: 77.75%
• 1Y: 128.45%
• 3Y*: 35.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWO vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	9.20%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	77.76%	19.98%	6.63%	9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWO and TINY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.49

FTWO vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTWO	TINY
Industrials	33.1%	4.8%
Energy	27.9%	-
Basic Materials	26.8%	9.8%
Utilities	11.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	10.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	70.5%

Return for Risk

FTWO vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 38
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 93
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWO vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTWO	TINY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	3.81	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	4.22	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.55	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	7.71	-5.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.40	27.08	-21.68

FTWO vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWO and TINY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTWO vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and TINY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWO	TINY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-43.79%	+25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-16.75%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.58%	0.00%	-10.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-16.00%	+12.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	4.76%	+0.19%

Volatility

FTWO vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is 6.14%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that FTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWO	TINY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	11.12%	-4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.04%	27.73%	-12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.70%	33.95%	-15.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	32.57%	-13.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	32.57%	-13.26%

FTWO vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWO vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than TINY's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.03%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.16%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWO and TINY in my portfolio?

FTWO and TINY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTWO or TINY?

TINY has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to FTWO (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTWO dropped -18.17% vs TINY's -43.79%.

Which ETF is better, FTWO or TINY?

On 1-year performance, TINY leads with 128.45% vs 26.68% for FTWO. On fees, FTWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FTWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTWO or TINY?

Over the 1-year period, TINY has performed better with a 128.45% return vs 26.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWO or TINY?

FTWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTWO or TINY?

FTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.16% for TINY.

What is the main difference between FTWO and TINY?

FTWO is categorized as Energy Equities, while TINY is Technology Equities. FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTWO and 0.58% for TINY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.