HAIL vs. XLU
HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAIL is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAIL returned -4.71%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for XLU. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
HAIL vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAIL achieves a 34.24% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.55% return.
HAIL
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 18.49%
- YTD
- 34.24%
- 6M
- 34.66%
- 1Y
- 65.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- -4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XLU
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
HAIL vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 34.24% | 19.62% | -6.98% | 9.65% | -45.72% | 1.95% | 84.33% | 30.63% | -19.96% | -0.65% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.55% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAIL and XLU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.21 |
HAIL vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAIL
XLU
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
HAIL
XLU
-
Technology
HAIL
XLU
-
Industrials
HAIL
XLU
-
Communication Services
HAIL
XLU
-
Energy
HAIL
XLU
-
Financial Services
HAIL
XLU
-
Basic Materials
HAIL
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
HAIL
-
XLU
-
Healthcare
HAIL
-
XLU
-
Real Estate
HAIL
-
XLU
-
Utilities
HAIL
-
XLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAIL vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
HAIL
XLU
HAIL vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAIL | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 0.68 | +1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 1.01 | +1.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.13 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.11 | +2.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 2.52 | +7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAIL | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 0.68 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.54 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.40 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
HAIL vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAIL | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -51.98% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -9.18% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.96% | -17.26% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.12% | -25.26% | -37.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.19% | -7.38% | -21.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -10.22% | -21.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 4.07% | +2.08% |
Volatility
HAIL vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.41%. This indicates that HAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAIL | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 5.41% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 11.76% | +10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 14.56% | +14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 17.32% | +14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 19.26% | +12.47% |
HAIL vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAIL vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than XLU's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.41% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.71% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAIL and XLU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAIL has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAIL dropped -65.98% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 5-year performance, XLU leads with 9.31% vs -4.71% for HAIL. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.31% return vs -4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HAIL.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.41% for HAIL.
HAIL is categorized as Global Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HAIL and 0.08% for XLU.
HAIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAIL and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer