HAIL vs. VT
HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - HAIL tracks the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAIL returned -4.71%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for VT. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
HAIL vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAIL achieves a 34.24% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 13.23% return.
HAIL
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 18.49%
- YTD
- 34.24%
- 6M
- 34.66%
- 1Y
- 65.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- -4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
HAIL vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 34.24% | 19.62% | -6.98% | 9.65% | -45.72% | 1.95% | 84.33% | 30.63% | -19.96% | -0.65% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 13.23% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAIL and VT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HAIL and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
HAIL vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAIL
VT
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
HAIL
VT
Technology
HAIL
VT
Industrials
HAIL
VT
Communication Services
HAIL
VT
Energy
HAIL
VT
Financial Services
HAIL
VT
Basic Materials
HAIL
VT
Consumer Defensive
HAIL
-
VT
Healthcare
HAIL
-
VT
Real Estate
HAIL
-
VT
Utilities
HAIL
-
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAIL vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
HAIL
VT
HAIL vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAIL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 2.44 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 3.36 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.27 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 14.59 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAIL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.44 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.71 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
HAIL vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAIL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -50.27% | -15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -9.67% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.96% | -16.51% | -24.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.12% | -26.38% | -36.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.19% | 0.00% | -29.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -7.02% | -24.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 2.17% | +3.98% |
Volatility
HAIL vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.75%. This indicates that HAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAIL | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 3.75% | +6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 10.13% | +12.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 12.67% | +16.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 16.04% | +15.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 17.23% | +14.50% |
HAIL vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAIL vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than VT's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.41% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAIL and VT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAIL has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to VT (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAIL dropped -65.98% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 5-year performance, VT leads with 11.39% vs -4.71% for HAIL. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 11.39% return vs -4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HAIL.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.41% for HAIL.
HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HAIL and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAIL and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer