PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAIL vs. FCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAIL vs. FCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAIL achieves a 34.24% return, which is significantly higher than FCG's 26.42% return.


HAIL

1D
3.04%
1M
18.49%
YTD
34.24%
6M
34.66%
1Y
65.65%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
-4.71%
10Y*

FCG

1D
0.48%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
26.42%
6M
22.68%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
4.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAIL vs. FCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
34.24%19.62%-6.98%9.65%-45.72%1.95%84.33%30.63%-19.96%-0.65%
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
26.42%-2.28%4.16%2.55%47.24%98.49%-23.20%-15.76%-34.81%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between HAIL and FCG is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.41

The correlation between HAIL and FCG shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAIL vs. FCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAIL
FCG

Consumer Cyclical

34.2%

-

Technology

33.1%
0.8%

Industrials

20.2%

-

Communication Services

4.9%

-

Energy

4.4%
99.2%

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

HAIL
34.2%
FCG

-

Technology

HAIL
33.1%
FCG
0.8%

Industrials

HAIL
20.2%
FCG

-

Communication Services

HAIL
4.9%
FCG

-

Energy

HAIL
4.4%
FCG
99.2%

Financial Services

HAIL
1.9%
FCG

-

Basic Materials

HAIL
1.2%
FCG

-

Consumer Defensive

HAIL

-

FCG

-

Healthcare

HAIL

-

FCG

-

Real Estate

HAIL

-

FCG

-

Utilities

HAIL

-

FCG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAIL vs. FCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAIL
HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FCG
FCG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAIL vs. FCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAILFCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

1.29

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

1.75

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.85

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.42

6.28

+4.15

HAIL vs. FCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAIL and FCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAILFCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.29

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.49

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.11

+0.33

Drawdowns

HAIL vs. FCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, smaller than the maximum FCG drawdown of -97.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and FCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAILFCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-97.20%

+31.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.64%

-13.07%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.96%

-29.44%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.12%

-33.33%

-29.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.19%

-74.51%

+45.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-65.37%

+33.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

5.93%

+0.22%

Volatility

HAIL vs. FCG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) at 9.81%. This indicates that HAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAILFCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

9.81%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

20.13%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.23%

26.81%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.79%

33.46%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.73%

38.31%

-6.58%

HAIL vs. FCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FCG's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAIL vs. FCG - Dividend Comparison

HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than FCG's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
2.17%2.86%2.76%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.82%2.87%1.46%1.56%1.70%4.79%
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
1.41%2.00%2.98%2.62%2.09%1.36%0.52%1.17%2.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAIL and FCG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIL has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to FCG (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAIL dropped -65.98% vs FCG's -97.20%.

On 5-year performance, FCG leads with 16.34% vs -4.71% for HAIL. On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FCG has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCG has performed better with a 16.34% return vs -4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCG.

FCG has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.41% for HAIL.

HAIL is categorized as Global Equities, while FCG is Energy Equities. HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while FCG tracks ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HAIL and 0.60% for FCG.

HAIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAIL and FCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer