HADAX vs. PALDX
HADAX (Hartford Balanced HLS Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, HADAX returned 7.28%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HADAX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
HADAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HADAX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.39% return.
HADAX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 15.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
PALDX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- —
HADAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HADAX Hartford Balanced HLS Fund | 5.50% | 12.10% | 11.30% | 14.79% | -13.70% | 19.69% | 11.54% | 22.68% | -5.35% | 5.62% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 7.39% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between HADAX and PALDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between HADAX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HADAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
HADAX
PALDX
HADAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Balanced HLS Fund (HADAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HADAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.46 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.40 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 15.74 | -6.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HADAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HADAX drawdown since its inception was -90.79%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HADAX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HADAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.79% | -26.16% | -64.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -5.96% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.78% | -16.06% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | -20.47% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.46% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.05% | -4.07% | -19.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.29% | +0.39% |
Volatility
HADAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Balanced HLS Fund (HADAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HADAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 3.29% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 6.78% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.06% | 8.34% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.02% | 12.17% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 12.70% | -0.74% |
HADAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HADAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HADAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
HADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than PALDX's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HADAX Hartford Balanced HLS Fund | 11.28% | 11.90% | 9.05% | 4.62% | 17.33% | 6.29% | 6.62% | 10.54% | 7.27% | 2.29% | 2.80% | 1.95% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.05% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, HADAX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HADAX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to PALDX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HADAX dropped -90.79% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HADAX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer