HACK vs. PSWD
HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and PSWD (Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - HACK tracks the Prime Cyber Defense Index while PSWD tracks the Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HACK returned 21.52% vs 15.26% for PSWD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for PSWD.
Performance
HACK vs. PSWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than PSWD's 22.48% return.
HACK
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 24.54%
- YTD
- 27.17%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
PSWD
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK vs. PSWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 27.17% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 18.61% |
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 22.48% | 1.69% | 9.46% | 18.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and PSWD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between HACK and PSWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
HACK vs. PSWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HACK
PSWD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HACK
PSWD
Industrials
HACK
PSWD
Financial Services
HACK
PSWD
Basic Materials
HACK
-
PSWD
Communication Services
HACK
-
PSWD
Consumer Cyclical
HACK
-
PSWD
Consumer Defensive
HACK
-
PSWD
Energy
HACK
-
PSWD
Healthcare
HACK
-
PSWD
Real Estate
HACK
-
PSWD
Utilities
HACK
-
PSWD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. PSWD — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
PSWD
HACK vs. PSWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | PSWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.65 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 1.47 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | PSWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.77 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. PSWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than PSWD's maximum drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and PSWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | PSWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -23.70% | -18.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | -23.70% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -3.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -6.46% | -5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 10.38% | -1.80% |
Volatility
HACK vs. PSWD - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) have volatilities of 10.68% and 11.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | PSWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 11.00% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.52% | 20.87% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 25.46% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 23.68% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 23.68% | -0.41% |
HACK vs. PSWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSWD's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACK vs. PSWD - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PSWD's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 0.72% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, HACK and PSWD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PSWD has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to HACK (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs PSWD's -23.70%.
On 1-year performance, HACK leads with 21.52% vs 15.26% for PSWD. On fees, PSWD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HACK has performed better with a 21.52% return vs 15.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSWD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index, while PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.20% for PSWD.
HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACK and PSWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer