PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HACK vs. ITEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HACK vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than ITEQ's 10.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HACK has outperformed ITEQ with an annualized return of 15.64%, while ITEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.76% annualized return.


HACK

1D
1.24%
1M
1.17%
YTD
19.40%
6M
17.34%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
15.64%

ITEQ

1D
-1.92%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
10.21%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
-1.70%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
19.40%7.97%23.49%37.44%-28.16%7.03%41.51%23.39%6.61%19.68%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
10.21%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%58.96%37.59%-0.63%26.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK and ITEQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015

0.81

The correlation between HACK and ITEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HACK vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HACK
ITEQ

Technology

92.7%
59.0%

Industrials

7.2%
17.0%

Financial Services

0.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

9.1%

Technology

HACK
92.7%
ITEQ
59.0%

Industrials

HACK
7.2%
ITEQ
17.0%

Financial Services

HACK
0.1%
ITEQ
5.4%

Basic Materials

HACK

-

ITEQ

-

Communication Services

HACK

-

ITEQ
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HACK

-

ITEQ
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

HACK

-

ITEQ

-

Energy

HACK

-

ITEQ
1.6%

Healthcare

HACK

-

ITEQ
2.5%

Real Estate

HACK

-

ITEQ

-

Utilities

HACK

-

ITEQ
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HACK vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HACKITEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.15

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.48

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

3.81

-2.20

HACK vs. ITEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the ITEQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK and ITEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HACK vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum ITEQ drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and ITEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HACKITEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.68%

-54.63%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-13.07%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-26.78%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

-50.29%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

-54.63%

+15.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-18.35%

+9.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-18.50%

+6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

5.08%

+3.72%

Volatility

HACK vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) at 10.20%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HACKITEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

10.20%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

18.83%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.06%

23.89%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

25.20%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

23.49%

-0.24%

HACK vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HACK vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison

HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than ITEQ's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.77%0.85%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HACK and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to ITEQ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, HACK leads with 15.64% vs 10.76% for ITEQ. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HACK has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.

ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index, while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.75% for ITEQ.

ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HACK and ITEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer