HACK vs. CHPS
HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Cyber Defense Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HACK returned 21.52% vs 223.67% for CHPS. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
HACK vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
HACK
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 24.54%
- YTD
- 27.17%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HACK vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 27.17% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 18.61% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and CHPS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HACK and CHPS has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HACK vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HACK
CHPS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
HACK
CHPS
Industrials
HACK
CHPS
Financial Services
HACK
CHPS
Basic Materials
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Communication Services
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Energy
HACK
-
CHPS
Healthcare
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Real Estate
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
HACK
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
CHPS
HACK vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.81 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 12.87 | -11.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 49.99 | -47.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 6.54 | -5.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.81 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -39.44% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | -17.50% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | 0.00% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -9.16% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 4.50% | +4.08% |
Volatility
HACK vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) is 10.68%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that HACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 14.18% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.52% | 28.19% | -6.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 34.43% | -8.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 33.78% | -9.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 33.78% | -10.51% |
HACK vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACK vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than CHPS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HACK and CHPS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to HACK (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 21.52% for HACK. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
HACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACK and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer