GXTG vs. PJBF

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GXTG is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.

Performance

GXTG vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GXTG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -15.01%
• 6M: -5.31%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 1Y: -3.84%
• 3Y*: -4.34%
• 5Y*: -11.97%
• 10Y*: —

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXTG vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	0.85%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%

GXTG vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GXTG	PJBF
Technology	22.3%	40.0%
Basic Materials	14.4%	-
Utilities	12.4%	2.0%
Communication Services	11.7%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	13.8%
Healthcare	10.5%	11.5%
Industrials	8.0%	16.5%
Real Estate	6.9%	-
Financial Services	2.3%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

GXTG vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXTG

GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 8
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXTG vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXTG	PJBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	—	—

Drawdowns

GXTG vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and PJBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXTG	PJBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.81%	0.00%	-67.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.93%	0.00%	-59.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.28%	0.00%	-43.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXTG	PJBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.44%	0.00%	+29.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.38%	0.00%	+28.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.92%	0.00%	+29.92%

GXTG vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXTG vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.48%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GXTG or PJBF?

On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXTG or PJBF?

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXTG or PJBF?

GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between GXTG and PJBF?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.59% for PJBF.