GXTG vs. IBID
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GXTG returned -4.66% vs 3.48% for IBID. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
GXTG vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.35% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -2.08%
- 5Y*
- -12.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.19%
IBID
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $123.03K | $106.22K | $198.85K | |
| $794.12K | $784.31K | $743.37K |
GXTG vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.80% | 3.52% | -3.55% | -1.88% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.35% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and IBID is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.02 |
The correlation between GXTG and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
IBID
GXTG vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.64 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 6.36 | -6.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 22.33 | -22.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -1.28% | -66.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -0.55% | -28.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.76% | -0.14% | -59.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -0.22% | -43.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 0.16% | +12.55% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | 0.32% | +13.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.87% | 0.92% | +24.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.66% | 1.15% | +30.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 2.21% | +26.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 2.21% | +27.94% |
GXTG vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than IBID's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.48% vs -4.66% for GXTG. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.48% return vs -4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 1.47% for GXTG.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer