GXTG vs. FYLD

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GXTG is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -11.97%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for FYLD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.

Performance

GXTG vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 18.62% return.

GXTG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -15.01%
• 6M: -5.31%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 1Y: -3.84%
• 3Y*: -4.34%
• 5Y*: -11.97%
• 10Y*: —

FYLD

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 14.36%
• YTD: 18.62%
• 1Y: 34.63%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXTG vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.37%	3.52%	-3.55%	10.26%	-48.08%	3.21%	61.07%	4.74%
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	18.62%	34.53%	3.00%	13.18%	-5.53%	18.67%	4.17%	5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GXTG and FYLD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019	0.56

The correlation between GXTG and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GXTG vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GXTG	FYLD
Technology	22.3%	3.0%
Basic Materials	14.4%	7.9%
Utilities	12.4%	4.0%
Communication Services	11.7%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	11.8%
Healthcare	10.5%	-
Industrials	8.0%	13.7%
Real Estate	6.9%	-
Financial Services	2.3%	22.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.9%
Energy	-	23.6%

Return for Risk

GXTG vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXTG

GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 8
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 94
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXTG vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXTG	FYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	2.87	-3.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	3.96	-3.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.50	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	6.14	-6.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	18.38	-18.72

GXTG vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXTG and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GXTG vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than FYLD's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and FYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXTG	FYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.81%	-44.55%	-23.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.65%	-5.67%	-18.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.97%	-15.15%	-14.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.17%	-25.12%	-36.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.93%	-1.45%	-58.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.28%	-8.78%	-34.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.41%	1.89%	+9.52%

Volatility

GXTG vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.84%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GXTG	FYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.44%	3.84%	+6.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.38%	9.65%	+13.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.44%	12.17%	+17.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.38%	16.25%	+12.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.92%	17.74%	+12.18%

GXTG vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXTG vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FYLD's 3.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.40%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.48%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXTG and FYLD in my portfolio?

GXTG and FYLD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GXTG or FYLD?

GXTG has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FYLD (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

Which ETF is better, GXTG or FYLD?

On 5-year performance, FYLD leads with 12.45% vs -11.97% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GXTG or FYLD?

Over the 5-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 12.45% return vs -11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXTG or FYLD?

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXTG or FYLD?

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.48% for GXTG.

What is the main difference between GXTG and FYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.59% for FYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.