GXPT vs. PSCT
GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index while PSCT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCT.
Performance
GXPT vs. PSCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly lower than PSCT's 49.75% return.
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCT
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 49.75%
- 6M
- 45.37%
- 1Y
- 89.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
GXPT vs. PSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 49.75% | 20.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPT and PSCT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPT vs. PSCT — Risk / Return Rank
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCT
GXPT vs. PSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPT | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPT vs. PSCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum PSCT drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and PSCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPT | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -40.44% | +21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -4.02% | -4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -7.89% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.64% | — |
Volatility
GXPT vs. PSCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPT | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 31.64% | -8.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 28.15% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 26.88% | -3.97% |
GXPT vs. PSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCT's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPT vs. PSCT - Dividend Comparison
GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while PSCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.22% | 0.47% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPT and PSCT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for PSCT.
GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.29% for PSCT.
Find the right allocation for GXPT and PSCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer