PSCT vs. QQQ
PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCT returned 17.12%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
PSCT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCT achieves a 54.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.12%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
PSCT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 54.35%
- 6M
- 49.00%
- 1Y
- 97.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
PSCT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 54.35% | 18.63% | -1.06% | 20.81% | -22.50% | 26.26% | 27.79% | 39.38% | -9.34% | 9.96% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCT and QQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PSCT and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCT
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSCT
QQQ
Industrials
PSCT
QQQ
Energy
PSCT
QQQ
Financial Services
PSCT
QQQ
Basic Materials
PSCT
-
QQQ
Communication Services
PSCT
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
PSCT
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
PSCT
-
QQQ
Healthcare
PSCT
-
QQQ
Real Estate
PSCT
-
QQQ
Utilities
PSCT
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCT
QQQ
PSCT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.61 | 3.44 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.88 | 12.79 | +14.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCT drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.44% | -82.97% | +42.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -11.96% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.96% | -22.77% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -35.12% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | -35.12% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.99% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -32.73% | +24.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.21% | +0.42% |
Volatility
PSCT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that PSCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 8.47% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.35% | 14.20% | +9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.54% | 17.67% | +13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.12% | 22.64% | +5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 22.43% | +4.47% |
PSCT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
PSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.22% | 0.47% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.15% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCT has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCT dropped -40.44% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 17.12% for PSCT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.
PSCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCT and 0.18% for QQQ.
PSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer