GXPS vs. XYLD
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
GXPS vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.59% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
GXPS vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 9.20% | -1.72% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.59% | 9.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and XYLD is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XYLD
GXPS vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -33.46% | +24.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -0.89% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -3.70% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 6.83% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 11.26% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 14.18% | +0.08% |
GXPS vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than XYLD's 10.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.53% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and XYLD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 0.54% for GXPS.
GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.60% for XYLD.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer