GXPS vs. PSCC
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index while PSCC tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
GXPS vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 17.25% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCC
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
GXPS vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 8.45% | -1.72% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 17.25% | -11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and PSCC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCC
GXPS vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -33.61% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -8.46% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -6.01% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.69% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 16.89% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 18.34% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 19.34% | -4.88% |
GXPS vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than PSCC's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 1.28% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.67% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and PSCC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.28% for GXPS.
GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.29% for PSCC.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer