GXPS vs. BOTZ
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.05% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -10.49%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 9.20% | -1.72% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.05% | 10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and BOTZ is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOTZ
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -55.54% | +46.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -12.06% | +5.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -18.26% | +14.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.10% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 25.43% | -11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 27.03% | -12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 25.82% | -11.56% |
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and BOTZ have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.54% for GXPS.
GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.68% for BOTZ.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer