PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPS vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 10.63% return.


GXPS

1D
-0.18%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
6.95%
6M
6.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.43%
YTD
10.63%
6M
9.15%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPS and BOTZ is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPS vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPS

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPSBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Drawdowns

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPSBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-55.54%

+46.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.14%

-3.72%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-18.32%

+14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

Volatility

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPSBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

23.97%

-10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

26.72%

-12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

25.72%

-11.78%

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPS vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
GXPS
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
0.56%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPS and BOTZ have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.

GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPS and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer