GXPC vs. PAVE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXPC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.

Performance

GXPC vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPC achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.

GXPC

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 6M: 3.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAVE

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 19.88%
• 6M: 18.87%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: 26.78%
• 5Y*: 17.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPC vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	3.83%	19.31%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	19.88%	4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPC and PAVE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

GXPC vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 59
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPC vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXPC	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.68	+0.75

Drawdowns

GXPC vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPC drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPC and PAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPC	PAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.59%	-44.08%	+27.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.91%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.11%	-1.82%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-6.24%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPC	PAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	18.84%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	21.60%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	24.38%	-4.59%

GXPC vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXPC vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than PAVE's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	0.12%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.77%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPC and PAVE in my portfolio?

GXPC and PAVE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPC or PAVE?

On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPC or PAVE?

GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPC or PAVE?

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.12% for GXPC.

What is the main difference between GXPC and PAVE?

GXPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPC and 0.47% for PAVE.