GOLS vs. GCAD
GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) and GCAD (Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLS is a Communications Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GCAD is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLS charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GCAD.
Performance
GOLS vs. GCAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOLS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCAD
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 36.09%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLS vs. GCAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 3.97% |
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLS and GCAD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLS vs. GCAD — Risk / Return Rank
GOLS
GCAD
GOLS vs. GCAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLS | GCAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.58 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
GOLS vs. GCAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum GCAD drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and GCAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLS | GCAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -16.14% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -4.89% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -3.03% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility
GOLS vs. GCAD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLS | GCAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 19.42% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 18.54% | -4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 18.54% | -4.98% |
GOLS vs. GCAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GCAD's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLS vs. GCAD - Dividend Comparison
GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 1.79% | 2.06% | 4.94% | 3.62% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLS and GCAD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GCAD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GCAD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
GCAD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
GOLS is categorized as Communications Equities, while GCAD is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.00% for GCAD.
Find the right allocation for GOLS and GCAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer