PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLC vs. PFDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLC vs. PFDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GXLC

1D
-2.61%
1M
0.60%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFDE

1D
-3.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC vs. PFDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXLC and PFDE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLC vs. PFDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXLC vs. PFDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLCPFDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Drawdowns

GXLC vs. PFDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum PFDE drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and PFDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLCPFDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-10.37%

+1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-3.75%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-2.04%

+0.54%

Volatility

GXLC vs. PFDE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLCPFDEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

16.30%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

16.30%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

16.30%

-2.67%

GXLC vs. PFDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PFDE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLC vs. PFDE - Dividend Comparison

GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than PFDE's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.64%0.30%
PFDE
Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF
0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GXLC and PFDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pathfinder. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.59% for PFDE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLC and PFDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer