GXLC vs. PFDE
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while PFDE is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PFDE.
Performance
GXLC vs. PFDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GXLC
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFDE
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC vs. PFDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.50% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and PFDE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. PFDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLC | PFDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. PFDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum PFDE drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and PFDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | PFDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -10.37% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -3.75% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -2.04% | +0.54% |
Volatility
GXLC vs. PFDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | PFDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 16.30% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 16.30% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 16.30% | -2.67% |
GXLC vs. PFDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PFDE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXLC vs. PFDE - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than PFDE's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.64% | 0.30% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GXLC and PFDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFDE.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pathfinder. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.59% for PFDE.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and PFDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer