GWILX vs. GQSCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GWILX (Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio) and GQSCX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - GWILX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Glenmede, while GQSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Glenmede. Over the past 5 years, GWILX returned 6.30%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for GQSCX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWILX achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 26.14% return.

GWILX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 3.01%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 1Y: 10.05%
• 3Y*: 10.86%
• 5Y*: 6.30%
• 10Y*: 10.25%
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

GQSCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 19.84%
• YTD: 26.14%
• 1Y: 53.63%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 12.97%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio	3.96%	8.19%	15.76%	17.36%	-13.71%	24.45%	7.84%	26.88%	-8.65%	0.47%
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	26.14%	12.22%	11.49%	18.94%	-8.48%	31.77%	7.60%	22.17%	-11.32%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GWILX and GQSCX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017	0.85

The correlation between GWILX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GWILX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWILX

GWILX Risk / Return Rank: 12
GWILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
GWILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GWILX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GWILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GWILX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

GQSCX

GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GWILX	GQSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	2.72	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	3.85	-3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.46	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	5.63	-5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	21.36	-19.67

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWILX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWILX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, smaller than the maximum GQSCX drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWILX and GQSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GWILX	GQSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-46.87%	+8.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-8.74%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.73%	-28.83%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.73%	-28.83%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.79%	-0.97%	-1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-8.03%	+2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.62%	2.32%	+2.30%

Volatility

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 3.29%. This indicates that GWILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GWILX	GQSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	3.29%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.36%	12.54%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	18.10%	-2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.41%	21.75%	-3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	24.66%	-5.54%

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GWILX and GQSCX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

GWILX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

GWILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.96%, more than GQSCX's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	2.62%	3.01%	10.53%	0.70%	9.45%	10.41%	0.51%	0.59%	0.77%	0.14%	0.00%
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio	89.96%	94.11%	13.95%	5.36%	3.42%	21.17%	0.94%	0.92%	4.73%	1.17%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GWILX and GQSCX in my portfolio?

GWILX and GQSCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GWILX or GQSCX?

GWILX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to GQSCX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWILX dropped -38.22% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.