PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWILX vs. GTCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWILX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than GTCSX's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GWILX has outperformed GTCSX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while GTCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.


GWILX

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.31%

GTCSX

1D
1.47%
1M
2.47%
YTD
11.78%
6M
9.78%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWILX
Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio
-0.23%8.19%15.76%17.36%-13.71%24.45%7.84%26.88%-8.65%22.90%
GTCSX
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio
11.78%-1.95%8.50%16.93%-10.91%28.87%15.65%21.12%-16.17%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GWILX and GTCSX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between GWILX and GTCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWILX vs. GTCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWILX
GWILX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GWILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWILX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GWILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWILX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GTCSX
GTCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GTCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWILXGTCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

2.17

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

6.92

-5.13

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the GTCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWILX and GTCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWILX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, smaller than the maximum GTCSX drawdown of -59.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWILX and GTCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWILXGTCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-59.45%

+21.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-11.13%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.73%

-28.54%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.73%

-28.54%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-49.50%

+11.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.71%

-0.66%

-6.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-11.99%

+6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

3.47%

+1.11%

Volatility

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) at 4.59%. This indicates that GWILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWILXGTCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

4.59%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

12.20%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

18.06%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

20.90%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

23.36%

-4.19%

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWILX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GTCSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWILX vs. GTCSX - Dividend Comparison

GWILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.03%, more than GTCSX's 7.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTCSX
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio
7.39%8.24%4.29%8.45%12.65%4.43%0.14%0.23%19.39%10.74%1.94%1.11%
GWILX
Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio
94.03%94.11%13.95%5.36%3.42%21.17%0.94%0.92%4.73%1.17%1.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWILX and GTCSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWILX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to GTCSX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWILX dropped -38.22% vs GTCSX's -59.45%.

GTCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWILX and GTCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer