GVUS vs. OILK
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVUS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
GVUS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GVUS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and OILK is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | -0.02 |
The correlation between GVUS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GVUS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVUS
OILK
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
GVUS
OILK
-
Technology
GVUS
OILK
-
Industrials
GVUS
OILK
-
Healthcare
GVUS
OILK
-
Communication Services
GVUS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
GVUS
OILK
Consumer Defensive
GVUS
OILK
-
Energy
GVUS
OILK
-
Utilities
GVUS
OILK
-
Real Estate
GVUS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
GVUS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
OILK
GVUS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.34 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.42 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 6.91 | +10.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.06 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.12 | +1.44 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -83.76% | +67.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -17.35% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.66% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -32.61% | +30.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 8.56% | -6.96% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.01%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 10.44% | -7.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 23.26% | -15.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 28.75% | -17.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 30.12% | -16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 35.97% | -22.69% |
GVUS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVUS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVUS and OILK have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to GVUS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 28.22% for GVUS. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.
GVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.68% for OILK.
GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer