PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.75% return.


GVUS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.24%
6M
14.89%
1Y
28.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVUS vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
14.24%15.90%14.08%5.51%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and ILCV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.95

The correlation between GVUS and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVUS vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVUS
ILCV

Financial Services

19.2%
16.5%

Technology

15.0%
23.8%

Industrials

13.1%
8.8%

Healthcare

10.8%
11.5%

Communication Services

8.5%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
7.6%

Energy

6.9%
6.0%

Utilities

4.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

4.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

3.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

GVUS
19.2%
ILCV
16.5%

Technology

GVUS
15.0%
ILCV
23.8%

Industrials

GVUS
13.1%
ILCV
8.8%

Healthcare

GVUS
10.8%
ILCV
11.5%

Communication Services

GVUS
8.5%
ILCV
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GVUS
7.3%
ILCV
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

GVUS
7.1%
ILCV
7.6%

Energy

GVUS
6.9%
ILCV
6.0%

Utilities

GVUS
4.3%
ILCV
3.5%

Real Estate

GVUS
4.0%
ILCV
2.0%

Basic Materials

GVUS
3.8%
ILCV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVUS vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVUSILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

4.08

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.70

16.87

+0.83

GVUS vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVUSILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.72

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.46

+1.09

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-58.63%

+42.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-6.55%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-9.32%

+7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.58%

+0.02%

Volatility

GVUS vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that GVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.01%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

6.97%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

9.82%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

14.21%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.28%

16.66%

-3.38%

GVUS vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GVUS vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.58%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GVUS and ILCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GVUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.22% vs 26.58% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.22% return vs 26.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.

GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer