PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. DHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. DHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than DHLX's 3.49% return.


GVUS

1D
0.40%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.29%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.48%

DHLX

1D
1.40%
1M
2.22%
6M
2.41%
YTD
3.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.04M$1.16M$722.10K
$3.81M$1.84M$668.69K

GVUS vs. DHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and DHLX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. DHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DHLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVUS vs. DHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVUSDHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.95

GVUS vs. DHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. DHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than DHLX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and DHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSDHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-8.40%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.56%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-2.64%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

Volatility

GVUS vs. DHLX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSDHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

11.70%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

11.70%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

11.70%

+1.51%

GVUS vs. DHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DHLX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVUS vs. DHLX - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than DHLX's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DHLX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF
0.64%0.15%0.00%0.00%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.49%1.77%2.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVUS and DHLX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DHLX.

GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.64% for DHLX.

GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DHLX tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Diamond Hill. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.55% for DHLX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and DHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer