PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHLX vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHLX vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 16.58% return.


DHLX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-2.01%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVDS

1D
0.52%
1M
4.03%
YTD
16.58%
6M
16.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHLX vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DHLX and LVDS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHLX vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DHLX vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHLX vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHLXLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-6.64%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

0.00%

-5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-0.95%

-1.60%

Volatility

DHLX vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHLXLVDSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

10.62%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.32%

10.62%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.32%

10.62%

+0.70%

DHLX vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHLX vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than LVDS's 7.36% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHLX and LVDS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DHLX.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 0.41% for DHLX.

They also come from different issuers: Diamond Hill and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DHLX and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHLX and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer