PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVLU vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVLU vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLU achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return.


GVLU

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.02%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.83%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
10Y*

FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLU vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GVLU
Gotham 1000 Value ETF
6.95%11.24%11.09%18.02%-3.80%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GVLU and FVD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.81

The correlation between GVLU and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVLU vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVLU
FVD

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
5.6%

Financial Services

15.9%
19.1%

Technology

14.5%
6.1%

Energy

11.4%
4.0%

Industrials

11.2%
14.2%

Healthcare

10.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.3%
11.6%

Basic Materials

5.2%
2.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.5%
8.1%

Utilities

0.4%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GVLU
16.1%
FVD
5.6%

Financial Services

GVLU
15.9%
FVD
19.1%

Technology

GVLU
14.5%
FVD
6.1%

Energy

GVLU
11.4%
FVD
4.0%

Industrials

GVLU
11.2%
FVD
14.2%

Healthcare

GVLU
10.8%
FVD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

GVLU
10.3%
FVD
11.6%

Basic Materials

GVLU
5.2%
FVD
2.1%

Communication Services

GVLU
3.7%
FVD
3.0%

Real Estate

GVLU
0.5%
FVD
8.1%

Utilities

GVLU
0.4%
FVD
18.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVLU vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVLU
GVLU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVLU vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVLUFVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

0.95

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

2.58

+4.82

GVLU vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVLU and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVLUFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.72

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.58

+0.03

Drawdowns

GVLU vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLU drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLU and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVLUFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-51.00%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-7.23%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.82%

-11.97%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-5.96%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.44%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.66%

-0.14%

Volatility

GVLU vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that GVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVLUFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.62%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

6.73%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

9.50%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

12.76%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

15.44%

+2.35%

GVLU vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVLU vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

GVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than FVD's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
GVLU
Gotham 1000 Value ETF
6.02%6.44%2.88%1.62%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVLU and FVD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVLU has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVLU dropped -20.82% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 3-year performance, GVLU leads with 15.80% vs 8.25% for FVD. On fees, GVLU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GVLU has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVLU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

GVLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.

They also come from different issuers: Gotham and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GVLU and 0.61% for FVD.

GVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVLU and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer