GVLU vs. FVD
GVLU (Gotham 1000 Value ETF) and FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. GVLU is actively managed, while FVD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GVLU returned 15.80%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for FVD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVLU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FVD.
Performance
GVLU vs. FVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVLU achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return.
GVLU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FVD
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
GVLU vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF | 6.95% | 11.24% | 11.09% | 18.02% | -3.80% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.21% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVLU and FVD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between GVLU and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVLU vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVLU
FVD
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
GVLU
FVD
Financial Services
GVLU
FVD
Technology
GVLU
FVD
Energy
GVLU
FVD
Industrials
GVLU
FVD
Healthcare
GVLU
FVD
Consumer Defensive
GVLU
FVD
Basic Materials
GVLU
FVD
Communication Services
GVLU
FVD
Real Estate
GVLU
FVD
Utilities
GVLU
FVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVLU vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank
GVLU
FVD
GVLU vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVLU | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 0.95 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 2.58 | +4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVLU | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.72 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
GVLU vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVLU drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLU and FVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVLU | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -51.00% | +30.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -7.23% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.82% | -11.97% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -5.96% | +4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -5.44% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.66% | -0.14% |
Volatility
GVLU vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison
Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that GVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVLU | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 2.62% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 6.73% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 9.50% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 12.76% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 15.44% | +2.35% |
GVLU vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVLU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVLU vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison
GVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than FVD's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.31% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF | 6.02% | 6.44% | 2.88% | 1.62% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVLU and FVD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVLU has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVLU dropped -20.82% vs FVD's -51.00%.
On 3-year performance, GVLU leads with 15.80% vs 8.25% for FVD. On fees, GVLU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GVLU has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVLU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
GVLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.
They also come from different issuers: Gotham and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GVLU and 0.61% for FVD.
GVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVLU and FVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer