GVIP vs. PBUS
GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GVIP tracks the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVIP returned 12.90%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
GVIP vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than PBUS's 10.82% return.
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 16.17% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 44.12% | 30.21% | -6.85% | 4.05% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVIP and PBUS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GVIP and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVIP vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVIP
PBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GVIP
PBUS
Financial Services
GVIP
PBUS
Communication Services
GVIP
PBUS
Industrials
GVIP
PBUS
Utilities
GVIP
PBUS
Healthcare
GVIP
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
GVIP
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
GVIP
PBUS
Basic Materials
GVIP
-
PBUS
Energy
GVIP
-
PBUS
Real Estate
GVIP
-
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVIP vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
GVIP
PBUS
GVIP vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVIP | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.08 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 13.93 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVIP | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.30 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
GVIP vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than PBUS's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVIP | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -33.15% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -9.02% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.29% | -19.07% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -25.40% | -11.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.64% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -5.13% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.99% | +1.15% |
Volatility
GVIP vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVIP | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 2.94% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 9.13% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 12.06% | +6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 17.05% | +4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.33% | +2.32% |
GVIP vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVIP vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVIP and PBUS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 13.48% vs 12.90% for GVIP. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 12.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.
GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.04% for PBUS.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVIP and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer