GVAL vs. POW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GVAL charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

GVAL vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 34.20% return.

GVAL

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 3.73%
• 6M: 8.80%
• YTD: 20.34%
• 1Y: 40.34%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 14.91%
• 10Y*: 11.00%
• ALL TIME*: 6.96%

POW

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -8.71%
• 6M: 18.02%
• YTD: 34.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	$3.55M	$5.48M	$6.45M
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.23M	$2.16M	$2.93M

GVAL vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	20.34%	5.94%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	34.20%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and POW is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

GVAL vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 90
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVAL vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVAL	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	—	—

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVAL	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.82%	-28.02%	-18.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.15%	+21.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-5.60%	-8.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GVAL	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	34.35%	-18.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.63%	34.35%	-15.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.00%	34.35%	-15.35%

GVAL vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVAL vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.37%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVAL and POW in my portfolio?

GVAL and POW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GVAL or POW?

On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVAL or POW?

GVAL is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVAL or POW?

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between GVAL and POW?

GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for GVAL and 0.75% for POW.