GUSH vs. XTJL
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GUSH is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GUSH returned 12.18%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for XTJL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
GUSH vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 69.71% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- 69.71%
- 6M
- 53.49%
- 1Y
- 78.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- -36.58%
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 69.71% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | -12.94% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 25.72% | -15.66% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and XTJL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between GUSH and XTJL shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GUSH vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GUSH
XTJL
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
GUSH
XTJL
Basic Materials
GUSH
XTJL
Communication Services
GUSH
-
XTJL
Consumer Cyclical
GUSH
-
XTJL
Consumer Defensive
GUSH
-
XTJL
Financial Services
GUSH
-
XTJL
Healthcare
GUSH
-
XTJL
Industrials
GUSH
-
XTJL
Real Estate
GUSH
-
XTJL
Technology
GUSH
-
XTJL
Utilities
GUSH
-
XTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
XTJL
GUSH vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUSH | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 2.18 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 3.23 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.22 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 18.27 | -11.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSH | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 2.18 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.65 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -23.24% | -76.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.94% | -5.12% | -23.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | -16.70% | -46.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.79% | 0.00% | -99.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.91% | -4.05% | -88.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.46% | 0.90% | +11.56% |
Volatility
GUSH vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.36%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.72% | 0.36% | +20.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.44% | 5.72% | +37.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.63% | 7.43% | +48.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.20% | 15.23% | +52.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.74% | 15.23% | +78.51% |
GUSH vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.47% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and XTJL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GUSH has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to XTJL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.68% vs 12.18% for GUSH. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer