GUSH vs. WEBL
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%) while WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GUSH returned 9.46%/yr vs -21.02%/yr for WEBL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.17% expense ratio.
Performance
GUSH vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 61.19% return, which is significantly higher than WEBL's -14.87% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 61.19%
- 6M
- 49.15%
- 1Y
- 49.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- -36.52%
WEBL
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -15.88%
- 1Y
- -12.75%
- 3Y*
- 27.57%
- 5Y*
- -21.02%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 61.19% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | 129.94% | -97.38% | 17.77% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | -14.87% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and WEBL is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.23 |
The correlation between GUSH and WEBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GUSH vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GUSH
WEBL
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
GUSH
WEBL
-
Basic Materials
GUSH
WEBL
-
Communication Services
GUSH
-
WEBL
Consumer Cyclical
GUSH
-
WEBL
Consumer Defensive
GUSH
-
WEBL
-
Financial Services
GUSH
-
WEBL
Healthcare
GUSH
-
WEBL
Industrials
GUSH
-
WEBL
Real Estate
GUSH
-
WEBL
-
Technology
GUSH
-
WEBL
Utilities
GUSH
-
WEBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
WEBL
GUSH vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSH | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.01 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | -0.23 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | -0.48 | +4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than WEBL's maximum drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and WEBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -94.44% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.94% | -56.57% | +27.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | -60.82% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | -94.44% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.80% | -74.94% | -24.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.90% | -58.90% | -34.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 26.44% | -13.28% |
Volatility
GUSH vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) is 18.07%, while Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a volatility of 19.12%. This indicates that GUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.07% | 19.12% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.41% | 45.07% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.06% | 57.70% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.35% | 80.76% | -12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.58% | 82.82% | +10.76% |
GUSH vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GUSH and WEBL have an expense ratio of 1.17%.
Dividends
GUSH vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than WEBL's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.55% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.23% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and WEBL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBL has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to GUSH (18.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs WEBL's -94.44%.
On 5-year performance, GUSH leads with 9.46% vs -21.02% for WEBL. Both ETFs have the same 1.17% expense ratio. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 18.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 9.46% return vs -21.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GUSH and WEBL have the same expense ratio: 1.17% per year.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.23% for WEBL.
GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%).
GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and WEBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer