GUSH vs. TSLL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. GUSH is passively managed, while TSLL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GUSH returned 6.88%/yr vs -7.12%/yr for TSLL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.

Performance

GUSH vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 42.54% return, which is significantly higher than TSLL's -37.67% return.

GUSH

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -19.15%
• YTD: 42.54%
• 6M: 41.51%
• 1Y: 31.85%
• 3Y*: 6.88%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: -37.01%

TSLL

• 1D: -12.25%
• 1M: -22.54%
• YTD: -37.67%
• 6M: -46.82%
• 1Y: -13.37%
• 3Y*: -7.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	42.54%	-19.39%	-12.73%	-7.23%	2.99%
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF	-37.67%	-26.80%	99.63%	139.86%	-74.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and TSLL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.16

The correlation between GUSH and TSLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GUSH vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GUSH	TSLL
Energy	96.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GUSH vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH

GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 20
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 20

TSLL

TSLL Risk / Return Rank: 8
TSLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TSLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLL Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TSLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TSLL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSH	TSLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	-0.15	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	0.39	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.04	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.25	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	-0.49	+2.81

GUSH vs. TSLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the TSLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and TSLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than TSLL's maximum drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and TSLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSH	TSLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-82.88%	-17.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.18%	-54.75%	+18.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.59%	-82.88%	+19.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.83%	-68.52%	-31.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.92%	-53.92%	-39.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.77%	27.78%	-14.01%

Volatility

GUSH vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) is 18.01%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a volatility of 28.98%. This indicates that GUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUSH	TSLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.01%	28.98%	-10.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.07%	56.84%	-12.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.58%	89.07%	-32.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.20%	106.91%	-38.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.43%	106.91%	-13.48%

GUSH vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSH vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than TSLL's 8.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	1.75%	2.60%	2.96%	3.00%	0.47%	0.00%	0.20%	1.68%	0.17%	0.00%	3.26%
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF	8.21%	5.00%	2.47%	4.44%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSH and TSLL in my portfolio?

GUSH and TSLL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUSH or TSLL?

TSLL has higher volatility (28.98%) compared to GUSH (18.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs TSLL's -82.88%.

Which ETF is better, GUSH or TSLL?

On 3-year performance, GUSH leads with 6.88% vs -7.12% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 18.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUSH or TSLL?

Over the 3-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 6.88% return vs -7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSH or TSLL?

TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSH or TSLL?

TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.

What is the main difference between GUSH and TSLL?

Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.83% for TSLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.